![]() I significantly disagree with your assumption there. The only reason to have compiled the game to run natively instead of emulated for the new ARMacs is for plans to launch on iPad and other iOS devices on the same code. No reason to natively support a very small group of players on devices (Apple laptops at 7.5%) on top of an even smaller group on a new architecture that only just launched. Only bad part of the cycle is when 1 is not competative and 1 side uses that to charge an arm and a leg. Intel has laptop cpu's along side their desktop ones.Ĭomparing a laptop to a desktop alone is bad. As long as AMD doesn't let apple embarass them too, we're probably looking at an amd vs apple thing with intel being on the side lines going "wtf happened?" intel is going to be the pubg of battle royal that thought they were the only game in town, until suddenly they barely mattered anymore. Now beating AMD is a diff story, amd has even passed intel at this point since intel has been standing still too long. Intel is still stuck on 14nm process and in a huge slump. I expect apple to own intel even at top end. ![]() make that comparison when they actually release a desktop version. You can't compare it to intels top desktop cpus, when it's literally just the version designed to compete with intels mobile line (and they destroy it). If ur an older mac user its good but if ur on any modern (last 2 yrs) intel or amd cpu ur better off goign them. ![]() I'm anti apple, so i dont expect much in general, but outside that this might change the meme of gaming on a mac Single thread it can beat a intel 10900k (likely not oc'd btw)Īnd moment you use multithread? intel will liekly pull ahead and ryzen will LEAP ahead. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |